Cost-effectiveness of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Protocol Implementation Compared to Routine clinical Practice in a Tertiary Hospital in Thailand

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20231101006

Enrollment

4579

Registered

2023-11-01

Start date

2019-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The use of thromboprophylaxis has led to significant reductions in VTE and PE incidences. There is a lack of cost-effectiveness evidence of the implementation of a VTE prophylaxis protocol in Thailand. VTE, prophylaxis, cost-effective

Interventions

Pre-VTE prophylaxis implementation that meant the duration of November 2018- November 2019 ,Post-VTE prophylaxis implementation that meant the duration of November 2019 - November 2020

Prevention,Prevention

Pre-VTE prophylaxis implementation,Post-VTE prophylaxis implementation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

15 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The patients admitted to the surgical department 2. Age > 15 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The patients who had previously undergone VTE diagnosis and treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), 1 year the cost per QALY gained	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) 1 year the likelihood of intervention cost-effectiveness across various willingness-to-pay thresholds.	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNutsiri Kittitirapong

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital

nutsiri7705@gmail.com0855539293

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026