We will study in success rate, intubating time of endotracheal intubation comparison between video laryngoscope (VL) versus intubating laryngeal mask airway (I-LMA) in manikin with manual in-line stabilization intubation, trauma, video laryngoscope, laryngeal mask airway
Conditions
Interventions
Device for endotracheal intubation,Device for endotracheal intubation
Experimental Device,Experimental Device
Video Laryngoscope (VL),Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (I-LMA)
Sponsors
None listed
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Emergency Medicine Residents and Paramedics of Emergency Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University agree to participate in this study.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Denied to participate in this study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| First attempt success rate for intubation After successful intubation immediately Chest movement after intubation within 2 minutes,Intubation time (seconds) Time from device place at incisor to trachea with chest movement Time (seconds) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cervical movement while intubation While participants place the device to the incisor passed vocal cord into the trachea with chest movement Angle (degree) | — |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Public ContactWelawat Tienpratarn
Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Outcome results
None listed