Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation Compared to Static Surgical Guides and the Freehand Approach in Implant Placement: A Prospective Clinical Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20230804001

Enrollment

Registered

2023-08-04

Start date

2021-11-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation, static surgical guide, and the freehand approach in a clinical setting. Patients with one or more missing teeth requiring dental implant treatment will undergo implant placement surgery using one of the three methods. Computer-Aided Surgery Surgical Navigation Computer-Assisted Surgery Dental Implants

Interventions

Patients requiring one or more implant placement surgery, will be randomly assigned to this group to undergo implant surgery using computer-assisted dynamic navigation. A preoperative CBCT with a fidu

s computer software, positioning and registration devices will be attached to the handpiece and patient&#039

s jaw followed by calibration of the dynamic navigation system. Implant placement surgery will be performed under the real time guidance of the navigation system, a postoperative CBCT will be taken an

Treatment,Treatment,Treatment

Dynamic Navigation,Surgical Guide,Freehand

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

21 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients over 21 years old. 2. Partially edentulous and in need of one or more dental implants. 3. Agreed to sign a consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes a day). 2. Metabolic bone disorders. 3. Uncontrolled diabetes. 4. History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region. 5. Patients that required extensive bone grafting.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Implant deviation Immediately after every operation Compare accuracy of the 3 techniques using software superimposition of the preoperative and postoperative CBCT to calculate coronal, apical and angular deviation between planned and placed implants	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Deviation in relation to implant position after completion of data collection Comparison of the degree of deviation in each group according the position of the implant in the oral cavity	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiaofeng Chang

Xian Jiaotong University Hospital of Stomatology

changxf@xjtu.edu.cn13186115533

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026