Skip to content

Comparison outcomes between single versus three toe taping techniques for 2nd, 3rd or 4th MTP joint instability: A randomized prospective crossover study

Comparison outcomes between single versus three toe taping techniques for 2nd, 3rd or 4th MTP joint instability: A randomized prospective crossover study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20230523001
Enrollment
26
Registered
2023-05-23
Start date
2022-08-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

2nd, 3rd or 4th MTP joint instability grade 2-3 (Coughlin staging) 2nd, 3rd or 4th MTP joint instability, plantar plate injury, Hammer toe, Claw toe, Crossover toe

Interventions

Use a tape to wrap the pathologic toe and splint it with 2 collateral toes. the end of the tape will wrap the 2 collateral toes to increased stability,Use a tape to wrap only pathologic toe. the end o
Experimental Device,Active Comparator Device
Three toe taping technique,Single toe taping technique

Sponsors

Mahavajiralongkorn foundation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.participants' ages are equal or older than 20 years old 2.Community ambulation patients 3.Paricipants is diagnosed as Degenerative lessor metatarsophalangeal joint instability of 2nd or 3rd or 4th toe grading 2 - 3 (Coughlin staging), including Crossover toe, Hammer toe or claw toe 4.Toe defect only 1 toe in each foot

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.non-ambulatory patients 2.There are any other deformities that may affect to treatment e.g.Severe Hallux valgus, ankle deformity, OA knee, OA hip, spine problem 3.abnormal sensation reception e.g. Diabetic neuropathy 4.Patients who have to take analgesic medicine e.g. Rheumatoid arthritis patients 5.Cause of deformities from acute trauma 6.Micropore allergy 7.Patients who cannot follow up at OPD as assignment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain reduction at 4 weeks after start the intervention VAS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
functional outcome, Satisfaction level, Stability, Durability, Comfortable, Compliance, Can perform by oneself at 4 weeks after start the intervention Thai SF-36 score, Thai FAAM score, Satisfaction level, Stability, Durability, Comfortable, Compliance, Can perform by oneself

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNatthan Autto

Department of Orthopaedics Phramongkutklao hospital

a_natthan@hotmail.com027639300

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026