Skip to content

Telemedicine versus conventional follow up program (CFP) for pessary care: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Telemedicine versus conventional follow up program (CFP) for pessary care: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20230511002
Enrollment
72
Registered
2023-05-11
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

women with pelvic organ prolapse will be treated with vaginal pessary at FPMRS clinic King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital POP pessary

Interventions

visit to virtual clinical encounters via video conference technology ,In-office clinical encounters follow-up visits
Telemedicine group ,Conventional follow up program group

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: women with pelvic organ prolapse will be treated with vaginal pessary at FPMRS clinic King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital New case of POP with successful fitting of pessary and prefer to continue pessary use Patient or Caregiver who can be contacted by telemedicine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women who could not attend follow-up during study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
patient satisfaction at 3 months PSQ 18

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare symptoms, complications and revisit rate between telemedicine follow-up and CFP at 3 month Thai PFDI 20 Visual analog scale

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNichanun Sukvaree

Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

nichamdcu@gmail.com0869040290

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026