Skip to content

Efficacy of buccal midazolam compared with sublingual lorazepam for reducing dyspnea as adjunct to morphine in palliative cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of buccal midazolam compared with sublingual lorazepam for reducing dyspnea as adjunct to morphine in palliative cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20230502004
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-05-02
Start date
2019-03-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer patients who were documented as palliative patients Palliative cancer patients dyspnea ESAS-Thai sublingual Lorazepam buccal Midazolam randomized controlled trial

Interventions

The participants were receive either 1.5 mg of buccal midazolam solution Both were provided as oral morphine adjuncts in both groups. Patients who were already receiving morphine received 10% of their
Experimental Drug,Active Comparator Drug
Midazolam group,Lorazepam group

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodhi Hospital Mahidol University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Cancer patients who were documented as palliative patients 2.At least 18 years old 3.Able to answer questions from the Thai version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-Thai) 4.Had a dyspnea score of 3 or higher on the ESAS-dyspnea

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with underlying cardiopulmonary conditions, including congestive heart failure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and glaucoma 2. Patients whose oxygen saturation (SpO2) is less than 88% 3. Patients who were on an endotracheal tube or used noninvasive ventilation 4. Patients with a history of benzodiazepine or opioid allergy 5. Patients who were on some medications, including valproate, probenecid, and phenobarbital 6. Participants who consumed alcohol 24 hours before the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To measure the severity of dyspnea, we used the Thai version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-Thai) 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes Thai version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-Thai)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
anxiety and well-being 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes Thai version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-Thai),respiratory rate, the use of accessory respiratory muscles, the level of oxygen saturation, sedation score scale 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes Physical examination,side effects 60 minutes including mucosal irritation, nausea, vomiting, and amnesia

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactManeethip Srimahakosol

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodhi Hospital Mahidol University

angledar2@gmail.com66834204191

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026