Comparison on Patients Satisfaction Between 2-Dimension and 3-Dimension Digital Smile Simulation

Patients satisfaction between 2-dimension and 3-dimension Digital Smile Simulation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20221206002

Enrollment

Registered

2022-12-06

Start date

2020-03-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

There is no research studying the comparison of patient satisfaction between 3D and 2D digital smile simulation techniques. Digital smile analysis, patients&#039

Interventions

Volunteers were taken 2D photography and VDO externally by the camera and scanned by the oral scanner. All data was simulated digitally into 2D and 3D outcomes and presented to volunteers.

Experimental Device

NIKON DSLR camera and 3-shape scanner

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 18-25 years, 2. some smile appearance defects, 3. Digital friendly, 4. literacy in the Thai Language, 5. Good general health

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. moderate to excessive dental anxiety, 2. Previous orthodontic treatment, 3. experience with digital simulation, 4. current oral lesion

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
satistaction 2 weeks percentage of satisfaction	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time 2 weeks percentage of satisfaction	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactWATCHARAPHONG ARIYAKRIANGKAI

Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University

watcharaphong.a@cmu.ac.th0898999392

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026