Skip to content

Robotic-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Clinical outcomes and 10-years survivorship. A Prospective cohort study

Robotic-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Clinical outcomes and 10-years survivorship. A Prospective cohort study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20221026002
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-10-26
Start date
2012-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the knee (OA Knee) OA Knee Osteoarthritis of the knee Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty UKA Robotic-assisted surgery

Interventions

Patients who underwent conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,Patients who underwent robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Treatment,Treatment
Conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with medial knee osteoarthritis and spontaneous osteonecrosis (SONK) that underwent UKA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency 2. Lateral compartment osteoarthritis 3. Previous history of knee fracture 4. Congenital disorder 5. Infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survivorship 10 years after intervention Kaplan-Meier estimate

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiologic outcomes 10 years after intervention Degree,Revision rates 10 years after intervention Percentage

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSwist Chatmaitri

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

swist_swist@hotmail.com0819879990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026