The efficacy of Beta-tricalcium phosphate and Calcium sulfate versus xenograft material with resorbable membrane in repairing peri-implant buccal bone defect : A prospective comparative study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20221008002

Enrollment

Registered

2022-10-08

Start date

2021-05-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

people who expected to have small to medium peri-implant dehiscence defect after implant placement and need to graft by using GBR technique Beta-tricalcium phosphate Calcium sulfate,Guide bone regeneration,GBR,peri-implant dehiscence defect,xenograft, membrane

Interventions

After stage one implant placement peri implant dehiscence defect will repair with Deprotinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) combine with resobable collagen membrane,After stage one implant placement pe

Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery

Deprotinized Bovine Bone Mineral combine with resobable collagen membrane,Beta-tricalcium phosphate and calcium sulfate

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

30 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Healthy adult patients at least 30 years old but no more than 70 years old 2.No serious systemic disease 3.Missing single tooth and require dental implant treatment 4.Adequate band of keratinize tissue 5.Patients who expected to have a dehiscence implant defect following implant placement the defect size of Vertical and Horizontal 2 to 6 mm and implant surface and reside within envelop bone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Poor oral hygiene 2.Presenting chronic periodontitis in adjacent tooth3.Patients who have conditions that complicate wound healing for example uncontrolled diabetes4. Patients who have conditions that might lead to lowered capacity of the bone healing for example osteoporosis radiotherapy 5.Pregnant or expecting to be pregnant 6.Heavy smoker 7.Patients who could not follow the treatment plan visits. 8.Patients who expected to have large bone defect 9.Patients who require implant treatment with sedation or General anesthesia due to fearful anxiety or cannot control pain under local anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Defect reduction immediate post implant placement to 6month after surgery Percent,Bone thickness reduction immediate post implant placement to six months thickness of bone graft from CBCT	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Graft volume reduction 6months Volume form ITK-Snap Software,Total volume gain 6months Volume fromGeomagic software	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNarit Leepong

Prince of Songkla University

Dentcare@gmail.com0818382803

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026