Skip to content

THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING A COMBINATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMPLANT SURGERY IN FULLY EDENTULOUS ARCHES: A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY

THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING A COMBINATION OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMPLANT SURGERY IN FULLY EDENTULOUS ARCHES: A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220925001
Enrollment
88
Registered
2022-09-25
Start date
2022-01-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accuracy of implant position in fully edentulous Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) Static CAIS, Dynamic CAIS Combination of static and dynamic CAIS Accuracy of implant position

Interventions

Implants were planned and placed by combination of static and dynamic CAIS method and then 3D deviation were analyzed by coDiagnostix software., Implants were planned and placed by static CAIS method
Combination of static and dynamic CAIS, Static CAIS,Dynamic CAIS

Sponsors

Chulalongkorn University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
51 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria for the patient selection: 1) Fully edentulous healthy individuals (ASA classification I and II), in need of an implant-supported prosthesis 2) sufficient volume for implant placement as documented by means of Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT), 3) adequate mouth opening for the use of static CAIS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients with severe systemic condition such as severe cardiac vascular disorders, uncontrolled endocrine disorders, leukocyte dysfunction or deficiency, bleeding disorders, coagulation disorders, neoplastic disease, renal failure, pregnancy or lactation 2 Patients with history of radiation therapy / medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw 3 Having bone augmentation during operative time 4 Abrupt alteration in treatment planning the surgical time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3D Deviation in platform ,apex and Angular deviation at 2 week after end of intervention treatment evaluation in codiagnostic software

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
direction 0f implant deviation After implant placement Post-operative CT scans were analyzed 3D deviation by coDiagnostix sofware

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAtiphan Pimkhaokham

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

atiphan.p@chula.ac.th0891308046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026