efficacy of different epithelial transplantation techniques in treatment limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) Limbal stem cell deficiency Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation
Conditions
Interventions
Patient with LSCD who underwent Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET) at Department of Ophthalmology, Siriraj hospital between October 2007 and March 2022,Patient with LSCD who underwent
Treatment,Treatment,Treatment
Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET),Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (SLET),Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation (COMET)
Sponsors
None listed
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: patients with LSCD who underwent Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (CLET) or Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation (SLET) or Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation (COMET) at Department of Ophthalmology, Siriraj hospital between October 2007 and March 2022
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: patients with less than 6 months follow-up
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| compare long-term outcome of different epithelial transplantation techniques in treatment limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) median follow-up time was 70 (IQR 30-135.75) months Survival rate | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| risk factor associated with the failure of outcome median follow-up time was 70 (IQR 30-135.75) months Risk factor analysis | — |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Public ContactPinnita Prabhasawat
Unaffiliated
Outcome results
None listed