Skip to content

Abdominoplasty Marking using a Laser Level comparing to a Traditional Method: A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abdominoplasty Marking using a Laser Level comparing to a Traditional Method: A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220819002
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-08-19
Start date
2022-08-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal skin redundancy Abdominoplasty, Abdomen, Lasers, Cicatrix, Patient satisfaction

Interventions

Clinical marking by traditional method.,Marking with the laser level
Clinical Marking,Marking using a laser level

Sponsors

Mae Fah Luang University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with the Pittsburgh rating scale 2, who underwent standard abdominoplasty

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: defects on the abdominal wall (abdominal hernias), previous abdominal procedures, abdominal scars, and significant asymmetry of the abdominal wall

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
distance between the clinical marking and the marking with a laser level at the most lateral part of the marking Immediately cm

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
different distance between the two marks at 7 cm and 14 cm from the midline Immediately cm,Abdominal outcome 6 months Salles scores,patient satisfaction 6 months visual analogue scale

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactApinut Wongkietkachorn

Mae Fah Luang University

apinutme@gmail.com0909092390

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026