Skip to content

Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealant in a Paediatric Population

Comparison of Retention between Conventional Sealant and Nanofilled Resin Sealant in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220528001
Enrollment
62
Registered
2022-05-28
Start date
2011-01-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retention of conventional resin sealant versus Nano filled sealant retention on permanent first molars with deep fissures or non-cavitated carious lesions of sixty-two children aged six to nine years. Prevention, Nano filled Resin, Primary school children, Sealant Retention

Interventions

Tooth sealant filling material,Tooth sealant filling material
Active Comparator Other,Active Comparator Other
conventional resin sealant was Delton FS+ (Dentsply Professional, York, PA),Nano filled sealant was Filtek Z350 flowable nanocomposite (3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA)

Sponsors

Researchers Supporting Project
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 9 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria of children included; a) Decayed-Filled Teeth (DFT) score of 3-6 and, b) presence of at least one pair of contralateral permanent mandibular first molars with deep fissures or non cavitated carious lesions c) Their entire occlusal surface was exposed without the presence of operculum covering the tooth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria included: a) teeth with discolouration, restorations, cavitations or developmental defects and, b) children who were physically and mentally challenged or with gross orofacial defects or have debilitating diseases were also excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
retention of fissure sealents one, three, six, twelve and eighteen months Invistigator clinical assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Development of occlusal caries one, three, six, twelve and eighteen months Invistigator clinical assessment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVinayak kamath

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Goa, India.

b_vk2002@yahoo.com918310412102

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026