Skip to content

Ultrasound-guided local wound infiltration versus ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: Randomized controlled trial

Ultrasound-guided local wound infiltration versus ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: Randomized controlled trial

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220516001
Enrollment
52
Registered
2022-05-16
Start date
2022-05-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided local infiltration in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy compare to ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block CAE, carotid endarterectomy, local infiltration, intermediate cervical plexus block, ultrasound guided

Interventions

injection 0.25% Bupivacaine total 22 ml divided to -subcutaneous to anterior of sternocleidomastoid muscle 5ml -above and under to sternocleidomastoid muscle 2ml/area -carotid sheath at level of caro
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery
Ultrasound-guided local wound infiltration ,ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are more than 18 years old scheduled for elective CEA under RA at Ramathibodi hospital and can communication 2. Submit informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of allergy to local anesthetics 2. Local sepsis at injection area 3. Known diaphragmatic motion abnormalities contralateral side 4. History of contralateral recurrent laryngeal nerve or phrenic nerve paralysis 5. Patients cannot tolerate in supine position 6. Patients who limit neck movement 7. Patients cannot communicate, delirium

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Lidocaine 1% supplementation (ml) after start operation until finish operation ml

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
sedation score 15 minutes after start sedation drug 0 awake, 1 minimally sedated, 2 moderately sedated, 3 deeply sedated, 4 unarousable,dose of fentanyl total operation microgram,complication total operation and 24 hours after operation Intravascular injection, intrathecal injection, respiratory failure/distress, local hematoma, local anesthetic toxicity, convert to GA, rate of shunt insertion, hoarseness, dysphagia, Horner syndrome,satisfaction score of patient and surgeon within 24 hours after operation 1 very dissatisfied, 2 dissatisfied, 3 neutral, 4 satisfied, 5 very satisfied

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAmorn Vijitpavan

Department of anesthesiology Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

fluotec@gmail.com0818191601

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026