Skip to content

A Comparison of human crestal bone between using healing abutment and CAD/CAM abutment under surgical guided surgery (1- 2 year followed-up ), A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

A Comparison of human crestal bone between using healing abutment and CAD/CAM abutment under surgical guided surgery (1- 2 year followed-up ), A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Status
Unknown
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220515005
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-05-15
Start date
2020-09-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In the past the success of implant therapy always mainly focused on the osseointegration. However, the achievement is not only the osseointegration, but the success should also be osseointegration and soft tissue adhesion around the implant at the same time. The stability of hard and soft tissues around dental implants play an important role for long-term implant prognosis.(Rotundo et al., 2015)dental implant prosthetic protocol, repeated dis- and reconnection of implant abutments resulted in co

Interventions

Healing abutments (control group) were using a conventional protocol which will remove abutment at the impression, Try in restoration, and Delivery of final restoration.,CAD/CAM abutments (Test group)
Other,Other
Healing abutment ,CAD/CAM abutment

Sponsors

Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with missing teeth in Posterior region with remaining adjacent teeth in between, needing single implant. This condition allows the surgical guides to be tooth-supported design._ No pathological mobility of adjacent teeth that supported surgical guide. CBCT radiograph and clinical examination reveal sufficient bone volume to support the implants. (Buccal bone and lingual bone thickness at least 2mm.) No limited mouth opening Age 20 years and over that able to sign consent form. Good general health at the time of selection (ASA class I or II). Adequate oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dehiscence or lack of buccal bone plate Irradiation in the head and neck area Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates Uncontrolled diabetes Addiction to alcohol or drugs Adjacent tooth between dental implant has pocket depth>5mm. Heavy smoking (>10 cigarettes daily) Parafunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Vertical bone loss 1-2 year Periapical radiograph was taken by using the paralleling technique (60 kV, 10 mA, 0.250s) with an individual rigid index made from acrylic resin

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Horizontal bone loss 1-2 year Periapical radiograph was taken by using the paralleling technique (60 kV, 10 mA, 0.250s) with an individual rigid index made from acrylic resin

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAdison Jirasuwannakul

Chulalongkorn university

ad_jayz2@hotmail.com66956629151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026