Comparison between short versus long radial sheath and the incidence of radial artery spasm during transradial angiogram and/or intervention: a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20220429007

Enrollment

156

Registered

2022-04-29

Start date

2021-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patient who schedule for transradial CAG and/or PCI Radial artery spasm, radial artery sheath, redial artery sheath length

Interventions

Glidesheath Slender 6 Fr with 10 cm sheath length ,Glidesheath Slender 6 Fr with 16 cm sheath length

Experimental Device,Experimental Device

Short radial artery sheath,Long radial artery sheath

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 20 years or over Schedule for transradial CAG and/or PCI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Contraindicated for transradial CAG and/or PCI Planned or used radial artery to other procedure such as CABG, AVF Contraindicated to contrast media Pregnancy Barbeaus test type D

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The difference of radial artery spasm between short and long radial artery sheath during procedure diagnosis of radial artery spasm	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
risk factor of radial artery spasm during procedure univariate and multivariate analysis,Complication 7 days after procedure hematoma, redial artery occlusion,Incidence of severe radial spasm during procedure pain score, angiogram	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactTorkiat Tantiwiwat

Cardiovascular division, department of medicine

torkiattt@yahoo.com081451111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026