Skip to content

The effect of platelet rich plasma injection on voice outcomes following phonosurgery

The effect of platelet rich plasma injection on voice outcomes following phonosurgery- a pilot study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220205003
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-02-05
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of platelet rich plasma of voice outcomes following phonosurgery for benign lesions vocal fold polyp platelet rich plasma effect outcome phonosurgery

Interventions

The standard surgical procedure is suspension micro laryngeal surgery (MLS) using cold steel instruments, under microscopic guidance. After hemostasis, 1ml of PRP to be injected in the upper surface o
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery
PRP,NON-PRP

Sponsors

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilateral benign vocal fold pathology requiring phonosurgical intervention. The lesion size should not account for more than 50% of the true vocal fold length. Patients between 18-75 years of age considered eligible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: upper respiratory infections two weeks prior to surgery, clinical signs of malignancy or recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, uncertainty of clinical diagnosis, bilateral vocal fold pathology, prior phonosurgical intervention, voluminous unilateral lesion occupying the whole length of the vocal fold, sulcus vocalis, severe cardiovascular and pulmonary pathology after preanesthesia evaluation, patients not fit for surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
voice quality three days and 3 weeks following the procedure Two way ANOVA- comparing fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer before and after the procedure. Measured by voice analysis softwre

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subjectivbe voice assesmenet before the procedure and three weeks after the procedure Mean and standard deviation for each group. VHI 30 questionnaire comparing values before and three weeks after the procedure (0-no subjective voice complaint, 120 maximum score))

Countries

Romania

Contacts

Public ContactUjvary Laszlo Peter

Iuliu Hatieganu Universily of Medicine and Pharmacy

ujvarypeter@outlook.com0746403264

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026