Skip to content

Lower Extremity Muscle Activation Between Single-leg Drop Landing vs. Jump Landing during the Weight-Acceptance Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lower Extremity Muscle Activation Between Single-leg Drop Landing vs. Jump Landing during the Weight-Acceptance Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20220129003
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-01-29
Start date
2020-07-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy female adults occasionally involved in any kind of sport and/or physical activity without joint deformity, recurrent or recent injuries of the lower extremities, and history of neurological disease, vestibular, or visual disturbance Muscle activation, lower limb, single-leg landing, ground reaction force, risk of injury, landing test selection

Interventions

Only the dominant (strongest) leg was used as the landing leg throughout the study. In order to determine the strong and weak landing leg, participants performed a single-leg horizontal hop for distan
Experimental Behavioral
Single-leg drop landing (SLDL) and Single-leg jump landing (SLJL) testing intervention

Sponsors

College of Sports Science and Technology MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY
Lead Sponsor
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 39 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. occasionally involved in any kind of sport and/or physical activity, 2. Q-angle within 10-20 degrees, 3. leg length discrepancy not exceeding 2 cm, 4. BMI within 18.5-25 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. knee joint deformity, 2. feet supination or over pronation, 3. pelvic side shift, 4. recurrent or recent injuries of the lower extremities, including patella dislocation, ACL injury, or ankle sprain, 5. musculoskeletal problems on either leg within the past three months prior to participation, 6. history of neurological disease, vestibular, or visual disturbance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
muscle activity During testing intervention EMG signal recordings which were processed with BTS Analyzer Software

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
peak vertical ground reaction force, time to peak ground reaction force During testing intervention Force platform recordings which were processed in BTS Analyzer software and MATLAB 2020b

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactMetaneeya Pilanthananond

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University

metaneeya.pil@mahidol.ac.th006622015611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026