Skip to content

The Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implant and Mini Dental Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes

The Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implant and Mini Dental Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial Outcomes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20210601001
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-06-01
Start date
2021-03-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Success rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), gingival index (GI), keratinized mucosa (KM), probing depth (PD), prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone loss, patient satisfaction Success rate, clinical implant performance scale (CIP scale), plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), gingival index (GI), keratinized mucosa (KM), probing depth (PD), prosthetic complication, implant stability quotient (ISQ), marg

Interventions

The clinical outcomes with more than 5 years follow-up were recorded in the patients who treated with 4 MDI, size 3.0x12 mm, were placed at the anterior mandible with Equator and immediate denture loa

Sponsors

Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai university
Lead Sponsor
Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Males or females who formerly participated in Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: Randomized Clinical Trial in Center Of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. 2. The patients who treated with implant-retained overdentures at least 5 years. 3. The patients who can come back for follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The patients who cannot come back for follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
radiographic bone level changes 5 years Digital imaging

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction 5 years Visual analog scale,Prosthodontic complication 5 years observation and record

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactWeerapan Aunmeungtongan

Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai Universit

weedentphd@outlook.com081806393

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026