Effectiveness of iNPWT Compared with Conventional dressing Following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20210427008

Enrollment

Registered

2021-04-27

Start date

2018-11-28

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal lymph node dissection iNPWT ILND Postoperative complication

Interventions

After operations, patients received wound care with incisional negative pressure wound therapy,After operations, patients received wound care with a gauze dressing

Experimental Device,No Intervention Other

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy,Conventional dressing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient age over 18 year old who underwent inguinal lymph node dissection in Srinagarind hospital since November 2018 to September 2020

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Known allergies or sensitivity to acrylic adhesives 2.Nonprimary closure surgical incision 3.Loss follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
wound complications 30 days observation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
cost-effectiveness until discharge hospital cost	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNatthiwan Sangrodchanatongchai

Surgery department

katnatthiwan@gmail.com0882810589

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026