Skip to content

Indirect dental restorations

EVALUATION OF 1-YEAR CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF CLASS II INDIRECT RESTORATIONS USING PORCELAIN, HYBRID, COMPOSITE BLOCKS TO DEVITAL TEETH

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20210316004
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-03-16
Start date
2018-07-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postendodontic restorations CAD / CAM Indirect Restoration Hybrid block Ceramic block

Interventions

composite block,ceramic block,hybrid block
Treatment,Treatment,Treatment
cerasmart group,e max cad group,vita enamic group

Sponsors

Erciyes University Scientific Research Foundation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patient has no systemic disease The patient should be over 18 years of age The patient should have good periodontal status Teeth to be restored should have proximal contacts on both mesial and distal surfaces and be in occlusion with the antagonist teeth Class 2 restorations of semptomless endodontically treated teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Xerostomia and bruxism; Absence of adjacent and antagonist teeth; Extremely poor oral hygiene, severe or chronic periodontitis; Pregnant or lactating women Teeth that have periodontal and periapical pathology. The patients who are undergoing orthodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success of indirect restorations 1 year Modified FDI criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiological success of indirect restorations 1 year Radiological evaluation of the restoration

Countries

Turkey

Contacts

Public Contactmehmet karagon

Research asistant

karagonmehmet93@gmail.com5398986902

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026