Objective is to create a valid and reliable performance assessment scale for simulated dispatcher-assisted CPR. The framework introduced by Downing describing the various steps of a validation process for performance assessment will be used Simulation Scale Telephone Cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR Internal consistency Reliability Dispatcher Bystander
Conditions
Interventions
Trained students are randomized in group 1 and 2 to carry out the scenario 1 or 2, respectively as trained bystanders.
Group E1 is constituted with 22 trained students who received one month before a
Other,Other,Other
Experimental group E1,Experimental group E2,Control group C
Sponsors
Simulation Center, University of Poitiers
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Dispatchers Dispatchers from the Grande Aquitaine region and Paris (France) with at least two years experience in dispatch Bystanders Experimental group, Students from the Medicine and Pharmacy Faculties of Poitiers receiving a one-day basic CPR training Control group, Students from the Medicine and Pharmacy Faculties of Poitiers who do not receive a basic CPR training
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Non-consent to video recording Missing one of the simulation session
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Telephone CPR at 12 months after end of the intervention Internal consistency and reproducibility | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Performance score within one year after end of the intervention Comparison of the performances between dispatch doctors and medical dispatch assistants, as well as the performances in CPR between bystanders with or without CPR training | — |
Countries
France
Contacts
Public ContactDaniel Ghazali
Academic Hospital of Bichat AP HP
Outcome results
None listed