Skip to content

RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROL TRIAL STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF USING AND NON-USING WALKING SUPPORT MACHINE TRAINING AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROL TRIAL STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF USING AND NON-USING WALKING SUPPORT MACHINE TRAINING AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20210123002
Enrollment
62
Registered
2021-01-23
Start date
2021-01-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) Walking support machine, TKR, Rehabilitation

Interventions

a rehabilitation program for 45 minutes,had an additional 15-minute Co-walk once a week for 6 weeks. Co-walk is is a walking support machine that helps to reduce pressure by reducing weight acting on

Sponsors

no
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. all patients that need TKR 2. sign inform and consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. patients who had Cerebrovascular events such as Ischemic stroke, Hemorrhagic stroke, Undetermined stroke, Transient Ischemic stroke 2.patients who lose follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motion(ROM), Western Ontario and MacMaster University (WOMAC) admission period, 2th, 6th, 12th, and 24th week. questionaire and range of motion goniometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of stay (LOS), time up and go (TUG), Weight-Bearing Balance, and Postural control admission period date and balance machine

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactBura Sindhupakorn

suranaree university of technology

bura@sut.ac.th0805886686

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026