COMPARISON OF POSTURAL SWAY BETWEEN BALANCE FOAM AND NATURAL RUBBER PADS ON IN HEALTHY ADULTS

COMPARISON OF POSTURAL SWAY AND RELIABILITY BETWEEN BALANCE FOAM AND NATURAL RUBBER PADS ON IN HEALTHY ADULTS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20201215010

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-12-15

Start date

2020-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy subjects

Interventions

Natural rubber pad,Airex balance pad,Firm surface

Experimental Device,Active Comparator Device,No Intervention No treatment

Rubber pad,Foam pad,Control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria required the participants to stand unaided with the eyes closed for 90 seconds, have no history of musculoskeletal or neurological disorders, no history of back or lower limb surgery, normal muscle power of the lower limbs, and to have consumed no alcohol within 48 hours prior to the test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The participants were excluded if a lower-limb injury was sustained during study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Sway velocity during intervention Force plate measure COP velocity during standing,Sway displacement during intervention Force plate measure COP displacement during standing,Sway displacement - Force plate	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
None None None	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactChuanpis Boonkerd

Thammasat University

chuanpis.b@allied.tu.ac.th0868997702

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026