Skip to content

A single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy between low-fluence alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser and low-fluence neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond for the treatment of UVB-induced hyperpigmentation

A single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy between low-fluence alexandrite 755-nm picosecond laser and low-fluence neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of UVB-induced hyperpigmentation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20201104004
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-11-04
Start date
2020-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

reduction of UVB&#45

Interventions

one experimental site was randomized to treatment by alexandrite 755&#45
nm picosecond laser weekly for 5 sessions. Then&#44
follow&#45
up visit was scheduled at 1 and 2 months after last session. ,one experimental site was randomized to treatment by neodymium&#45
doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064&#45
nm picosecond weekly for 5 sessions. Then&#44
up visit was scheduled at 1 and 2 months after last session. ,one experimental site was randomized to no treatment which was evaluated the response every visit similar to other 2 sites.
alexandrite 755&#45
nm picosecond laser,neodymium&#45
nm picosecond,no treatment

Sponsors

Division of Dermatology, Department of medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital
Lead Sponsor
Division of Dermatology&#44
Collaborator
Department of medicine&#44
Collaborator
Faculty of Medicine&#44
Collaborator
Ramathibodi hospital
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: aged of 18-65 years with Fitzpatrick skin type II-IV

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: had other skin diseases including active skin infection, inflammatory lesions, wound, and skin cancer currently used chemical peel, whitening agents or received laser therapy 1 month before enrollment immunocompromised patients photosensitivity or currently on photosensitizing medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mean relative lightness index evaluate at every visit colorimeter (DSM II ColorMeter®)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
patient satisfaction scores evaluate at every visit visual analogue scale on satisfaction of treatment,physician improvement scores evaluate at every visit visual analogue scale on improvement of hyperpigmentation

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactVasanop Vachiramon

Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital

vasanop@gmail.com022011211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026