Comparative Study Between Intersphinecteric Ligation of Perianal Fistula Versus Conventional Fistulotomy with or Without Seton in the Treatment of Perianal Fistula

Intersphinecteric Ligation of Perianal Fistula Versus Conventional Fistulotomy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20201102003

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-11-02

Start date

2017-10-18

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

perianal fistula. Intersphinecteric Ligation of Perianal Fistula Conventional Fistulotomy

Interventions

Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery

LIFT,fistulotomy

ligation of inter sphinectric fistula tract ,lay open the fistula tract

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age â‰¥ 18 years old. Diagnosis of low transsphincteric fistula by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: high transsphinctrric fistula. Inter sphinectric fistula. Branching fistula. Multiple fistulas. Supra sphincteric fistula. Previous anal surgery. Inflammatory Bowel Disease as crohnâ€™s, tuberculosis. History of fecal incontinence.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
cure rate 6 monthes clinical exam	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
recurrance 6 monthes clinical exam	—

Countries

egypt

Contacts

Public Contactsamy mawllana

menufia unevesity

samymawllana@gmail.com0201060452557

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026