Videolaryngoscope-guided versus standard digital technique for proseal laryngeal mask airway placement by anesthesia residents: A randomized controlled, double-blind study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20201015004

Enrollment

138

Registered

2020-10-15

Start date

2020-10-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

LMA malposition proseal lma insertion technique

Interventions

Standard digital insertion technique,Videolaryngoscope-assited insertion

Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery

Standard digital technique,Videolaryngoscope-assited insertion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing elective surgery under GA with proseal LMA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy BMI > 35 oropharyngeal pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Proper position of Proseal LMA Post-procedure Fiberoptic bronchoscopy	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Hemodynamic changes, complications associated with LMA placement (sore throat, dysphagia, nausea/vomiting, cough, blood stain on removal) 1,3,5,10 min 1hr 24hr mmHg, bpm, numbers of participants	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactThanawat Benjamungkalarak

Dapartmentof Anesthesiology Faculty of medicine Chlalongkorn university

benjamungkalarak.t@gmail.com0897475570

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026