Skip to content

Comparison of the effectiveness between Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation and Conventional Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Comparison of the effectiveness between Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation and Conventional Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20200828002
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-08-28
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

severe degree of carpal tunnel syndrome carpal tunnel syndrome Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

Paticipant will have 5 sessions of Peripheral Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation with the coil located at the wrist. The magnetic stimulation protocol consisted in 100 trains of 10 pulses/train, delivere
Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation,Conventional Therapy

Sponsors

General Research Grant
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study included patients with age above 18 years with electrophysiological proof of having carpal tunnel syndrome (mild to moderate degree)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with history of surgical release of carpal tunnel 2.Patients with previous wrist fracture or wrist dislocation 3.Patients with underlying disease such as diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism and rheumatoid arthritis. 4.Patients with history suggestive of any neurological disease such as polyneuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, ulnar neuropathy 5.Patients with magnetic Stimulate contraindication such as installing pacemakers, cochlear implant or intracranial metal objects, pregnant females or those who are not consenting for the procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
symptom and functional severity 2 weeks after end of the intervention Thai Version Boston Questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
pinch strength 2 weeks after end of the intervention using pinch gauges to measure strenght

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactArachaphon Panathoop

Faculty of medicine, Khon Kean University

aracha818@gmail.com0650564147

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026