Applying action observation during mind-machine interface on upper limb recovery in chronic stroke

Effect of Combined action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation of upper extremity function in the chronic stroke patient : A single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20200821002

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-08-21

Start date

2020-08-27

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke hemiparesis stroke motor imagery action observation brain-computer interfaces upper extremity function EEG

Interventions

the participant will be received combined action observation and motor imagery&#45

based brain&#45

computer interfaces training,the participant will be received motor imagery&#45

computer interfaces training

Experimental Other,Active Comparator Other

AOMI&#45

BCI group,MI&#45

BCI group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

40 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) first-ever subcortical or cortical stroke caused by ischemia or hemorrhage 2) being stroke at least 6 months 3) age between 40 to 80 years 4) paralysis of one side of body 5) normal vision 6) Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) score > 25 7) Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score 0-45 8) sit on the chair last longer than 45 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) severe upper limb spasticity or pain (grade 3 or higher of modified Ashworth scale and visual analog scale 75 to 100 mm) 2) cognitive dysfunction (Mini-Mental State Exam score < 23 3) other neurological diseases such as psychiatric disorder, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and musculoskeletal disorder restricting joint movement such as wrist and finger osteoarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, de quervain's tenosynovitis, and trigger finger, severe hemispatial neglect, severe aphasia, apraxia, history of epilepsy, and craniotomy, pacemaker, steel plates or contraindication for functional electrical stimulation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Upper Extremity Function at 1 months after end of the intervention Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
EEG features (absolute power, relative power and coherence value) at 1 months after end of the intervention EEG (Electroencephalogram),Range of Motion of Wrist extension at 1 months after end of the intervention Goniometer	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactNuttawat Rungsirisilp

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University

nuttawat.run@hotmail.com0874991168

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026