Skip to content

Pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol VS calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars

Pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol VS calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20200505005
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-05-05
Start date
2005-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pulp necrosis irreversible pulpitis

Interventions

New root canal filling material with better properties such as resorbable and have long&#45
lasting antibacterial properties.,The most popular root canal filling material for primary teeth with high success rate but there are some disadvantages such as its resistance to foreign body giant ce
Experimental Drug,Active Comparator Drug
Vitapex,ZOE

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
3 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. clinical characteristics determined by the presence of a deep carious lesion with pulp exposure, where the bleeding could not be stopped following removal of the coronal pulp tissue, spontaneous pain or chronic apical abscess, abnormal mobility not associated with normal exfoliation, pain on percussion, and fistula or abscess; 2. coronal radiographic characteristics defined by the radiographic evidence of a deep carious lesion or lesion with radiographic pulp exposure in the crown; and 3. radiographic appearances of the root and supportive structure that could be categorized into the following 4 groups: a. no pathology b. discontinuity of lamina dura c. furcation involvement less than or equal to half of the shortest root in vertical measurement d. furcation involving more than half of the shortest root

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. obliteration of the root canal 2. internal resorption 3. physiologic root resorption more than a third of its length

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success rate 6,12,24,36 months Clinical observation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic success rate 6,12,24,36 months Radiographic examination

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactChutima Trairatvorakul

Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

ctrairat@yahoo.com0-2218-8906

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026