Compared the success rate between Direct Laryngoscope and Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in Emergency Department: RCT

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20200503003

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2020-05-03

Start date

2015-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

compared the 1st attempt success of intubation between video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope VDO laryngoscope&#44

Interventions

laryngoscope with a video monitor ,standard laryngoscope without monitor

Experimental Device,Experimental Device

Video laryngoscope,Directec laryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient age more than 18 years old and met intubation criteria, participant group

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient who sign Do not resuscitation or end of life care

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The 1st attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The 2nd attempt intubation success not more than 150 second n (%),mean time duration of intubation not more than 150 second mean/ median time,Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%),Cormack-Lehane view of intubation not more than 150 second n (%)	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public Contactpitsucha sanguanwit

ramathibodi hospital

pitsucha.san@mahidol.edu0841300301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026