Skip to content

Robotic assisted vs conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective non-randomized trial

Robotic assisted vs conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective non-randomized trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20200427005
Enrollment
92
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2012-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Survivorship Knee Arthroplasty Robot

Interventions

A preoperative CT scan was obtained and computer&#45
aided design (CAD) model was created. Preoperative planning including component size and position and joint anatomy restoration was performed by surgeons. Intraoperatively&#44
after bone registration&#44
the ligament balancing curve was generated by applying valgus stress force to knee at 20° intervals from full extension to full flexion. The quantitatively fine tuning of component position was done
Mako calculated the 3D volume of bone resection. This system used tactile feedback and audio signals for controlling high&#45
speed burr during bone resection. Finally&#44
Restoris MCK prosthesis (Mako Surgical Corporation&#44
Fort Lauderdale&#44
Florida&#44
USA) using RIO system was implanted according to surgical planning.,The procedure was carried out using we Oxford partial knee microplasty instrumentation and cemented Oxford phase 3 mobile bearing pr
Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
Robotic assisted UKA,Conventional UKA

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients who diagnosed with isolated medial compartmental OA or ON and scheduled to undergo UKA were recruited. The indications for UKA included varus deformity 90°.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria was inflammatory arthritis, previous surgery at hip, knee or ankle, extraarticular deformity of affected limb, psychological problem or refusal to participate. Furthermore, during operation, the patients who had moderate to severe OA in lateral or patellofemoral compartment, cruciate ligaments insufficiency were also excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Revision at 5 and 10 years after surgery Revision rate for any reasons

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Knee function at 5 and 10 years after surgery Oxford knee score,Complication at 5 and 10 years after surgery Number of infection, fracture, loosening and dislocation

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactChaturong Pornrattanamaneewong

Mahidol university

toonchaturong@gmail.com0817553977

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026