FindTrial
Sign In

Complications, reasons for reoperation, and 5-year prosthesis survival compared between the cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Thai patients

Complications, reasons for reoperation, and 5-year prosthesis survival compared between the cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Thai patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20200427004
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2020-04-27
Start date
2020-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Survivorship of knee arthroplasty Survivorship knee arthroplasty

Interventions

The patients who underwent cemented UKA in Siriraj hospital between 2003&#45
2013,The patients who underwent cement less UKA in Siriraj hospital between 2003 and 2013,The patients who underwent hybrid UKA in Siriraj hospital between 2003 and 2013
Other,Other,Other
Cemented UKA,Cementless UKA,Hybrid UKA

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients who diagmosed with medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis and underwent Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Siriraj hospital between 2003 and 2013

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Incomplete data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survivorship Until the last follow-up period Revision rate for any reasons—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complication rate Until the last follow-up period Rate of infection, fracture and dislocation,Reasons for reoperation Until the last follow-up period aseptic loosening, bearing dislocation, PJI—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactChaturong Pornrattanamaneewong

Mahidol university

toonchaturong@gmail.com0817553977

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026