Skip to content

Does Small Vertical Incision Differs from Conventional Horizontal Incision in Risk of Injury to Branches of Saphenous Nerve During Hamstring Graft Harvest? : a Prospective Comparative Study

Does Small Vertical Incision Differs from Conventional Horizontal Incision in Risk of Injury to Branches of Saphenous Nerve During Hamstring Graft Harvest? : a Prospective Comparative Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20200120001
Enrollment
72
Registered
2020-01-20
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical approach for hamstring graft harvest for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. ACL reconstruction&#44

Interventions

Small vertical incision &#44
When approach to ACL reconstruction,Standard horizontal incision &#44
when approach to ACL reconstruction
Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery,Active Comparator Procedure/Surgery
Small vertical incision,Standard horizontal incision

Sponsors

Kavin Poriswanich
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who diagnosed with ACL injury those required arthroscopically-assisted primary ACL reconstructions with Hamstring tendon graft

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Prior knee surgery -Neurological disease -Multiple ligamentous injury other than ACL

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of numbness 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months (postoperative) Binary outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Recovery pattern of paresthesia 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months Manual count from calibrated graph sheet

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactKavin Poriswanich

Chulalongkorn University

k_kavinp@hotmail.com0814225331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026