Skip to content

Comparing the effectiveness of lumbar rotation to central posteroanterior mobilization in the treatment of individuals with bilateral non-specific low back pain

Comparing the effectiveness of lumbar rotation to central posteroanterior mobilization in the treatment of individuals with bilateral non-specific low back pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20191209003
Enrollment
70
Registered
2019-12-09
Start date
2019-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low back pain nonspecific low back pain spinal manipulative therapy back range of motion

Interventions

The lumbar rotation mobilization will be applied by rotating the participant’s pelvis with small oscillatory movements away from immobility side while the participant is in side&#45
lying position. The mobilization technique will be applied as 2&#45
minute repetitions directly to identify symptomatic spinal level obtained from the assessment procedures.,The central PA mobilization will be applied to spinous process of lumbar spine in prone positi
minute repetitions directly to identify symptomatic spinal level obtained from the assessment procedures.
Experimental Other,Experimental Other
Rotation group,Central PA group

Sponsors

Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) aged 18 - 55 years old 2) bilateral symptom of NSLBP at rest more than 25 on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) 3) no radicular symptoms in the lower limbs 4) have not been taking any medications inclusion NSAIDs, muscle relaxant and pain relief in treatment day (within 24 hours) 5) no history of trauma or fracture of lumbar spine, and spine surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) have any contraindications to mobilization such as malignancy, disease of spinal cord and/or cauda equine, or infectious disease known as specific LBP10 2) continue taking medication form medical orders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain baseline, after placebo (10 mins), after intervention (16 mins), and follow up (48 hours) Visual analog scales,Lumbar range of motion baseline, after placebo (10 mins), after intervention (16 mins), and follow up (48 hours) Back range of motion (BROM II)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disability baseline and follow up (48 hours) Thai version of Functinal Rating Index

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAkkradate Siriphorn

Chulalongkorn University

akkradate.s@chula.ac.th022183768

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026