Skip to content

Comparison of efficacy between using a power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush by primary caregivers in preschool children: a randomized clinical trial

Comparison of efficacy between using a power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush by primary caregivers in preschool children: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20190907004
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-09-07
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingivitis Gingivitis Gingival index Plaque index

Interventions

Colgate Kids Battery Powered Toothbrush has a small oscillating head that cleans teeth and gently sweeps away plaque. This kids powered toothbrush (using 2 replaceable AAA alkaline batteries has extra
a slim handle&#44
and an easy on/off button.,Colgate Kids Extra Soft Manual Toothbrush is designed for 2&#45
5 years old children who have all their baby teeth. This toothbrush features a small head for easy access to child’s mouth and a suction cup for upright storage.
Experimental Device,Experimental Device
power toothbrush,manual toothbrushe

Sponsors

Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
3 Years to 5 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 3 to 5 years old children 2. Children with complete primary dentition 3. Primary caregiver is a father or a mother. 4. Children who have overall plaque index (Modified Quigley Hein index) greater than or equal to 1.8.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Medically compromised children 2. Primary caregiver with psychological problem or physical disability which limit ability to clean oral cavity for children. 3. Children who received antibiotics within a month prior to the study 4. Children who have any restoration on tooth 51, 55, 65, 71, 75 and 85 5. Children with crowding and/or mouthbreathing 6. Children with oral soft tissue pathology 7. Children who is receiving periodontal treatment. 8. Children who is receiving orthodontic treatment. 9. Children who have ever used power toothbrush. 10. Primary caregiver who are health care providers. 11. Children who have ever used additional oral care products prior to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the efficacy of plaque removal between using power or manual toothbrush baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 5 weeks (T3), 13 weeks (T4) and 25 weeks (T5) Plaque index

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the efficacy of reducing gingival inflammation between using power or manual toothbrush baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 5 weeks (T3), 13 weeks (T4) and 25 weeks (T5) Gingival index

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactOnnida Wattanarat

Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University

onni076@gmail.com6684-9857634

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026