COMPARISON THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT POSITION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMPLANT SURGERY WITH TWO-IMPLANT SUPPORT FIXED PARTIAL PROSTHESIS

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20181224002

Enrollment

Registered

2018-12-24

Start date

2018-10-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

accuracy of implant position Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS)&#44

Interventions

Inclusion criteria 1.Patients who have edentulous space which require two dental fixtures support fixed partial denture. 2.Extractions completed at least 2 months prior to implant placement. 3.No li

such as surgical guide fractures&#44

surgical guide incline that affect to mis&#45

alignment of implant position. ,Inclusion criteria 1.Patients who have edentulous space which require two dental fixtures support fixed partial denture. 2.Extractions completed at least 2 months prio

alignment of implant position.

Experimental Procedure/Surgery,Experimental Procedure/Surgery

Static CAIS group,Dynamic CAIS group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria 1.Patients who have edentulous space which require two dental fixtures support fixed partial denture. 2.Extractions completed at least 2 months prior to implant placement. 3.No limited mouth opening for placing surgical guide and drill. 4.Age 20 years and over.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria 1.Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions that would affect to dental implant treatment. 2.Clinical or radiographic signs presents any pathology in the jaw bone. 3.Patients on orthodontic appliance. 4.Patients with pathological mobility of adjacent teeth that supported surgical guide. 5.Patients underwent perioperative complications that make surgical guide less accurate, such as surgical guide fractures, surgical guide incline that affect to mis-alignment of implant position.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The accuracy of implant position After implant placement The planned position of the implant will be compared with the actual position of the implant after i	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The parallelism between two placed dental implants in each patient. After implant placement Measured by treatment evaluation tool function of coDiagnostiX software (Dental wings inc, Montreal,	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAtiphan Pimkhaokham

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery

atiphan.p@chula.ac.th02-2188581

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026

COMPARISON THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT POSITION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPUTER&#45;ASSISTED IMPLANT SURGERY WITH TWO&#45;IMPLANT SUPPORT FIXED PARTIAL PROSTHESIS