FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Clinical Outcome Associated with Surgical Open Gastrostomy and Push-Method Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients with Upper Aero-digestive malignancies, Single Center Analysis.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between surgical gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with introducer technique in patients with upper aero-digestive malignancies, single center analysis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20181220004
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-12-20
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with upper aero-digestive malignancies Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, surigical gastrostomy, upper aero-digestive malignancies

Interventions

patients with upper aero&#45
digestive malignancies who underwent Surgical open gastrostomy.,patients with upper aero&#45
digestive malignancies who underwent EGD with push PEG technique.
Treatment,Treatment
Surgical open gastrostomy ,Push&#45
PEG

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients diagnosed as upper aero-digestive malignancies who underwent SOG and Push-PEG

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
procedure related in hospital complication (such as pnuemonia, bleeding, peritonitis, death) post operationtion to discharge times—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
length of stay, pain score at 24 hr after operation post operationtion to discharge days and visual analog score for pain score.—

Countries

thailand

Contacts

Public ContactArunchai Chang

Hatyai hospital

busmdcu58@gmail.com0650979414

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026