Transperineal ultrasonography simplest step in diagnostic anorectal malformation

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20181204004

Enrollment

Registered

2018-12-04

Start date

2018-10-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ARM ARM

Interventions

compparison in performance of Transperineal ultrasonography vs Prone lateral cross&#45

table and urinalysis on the diagnosis of ARM

Experimental Radiation

Transperineal ultrasonography vs Prone lateral cross and urinalysisable

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Neonate of anorectal malformation 2.Neonates undergoTransperineal US 3.Complete of record, treatment history 4.Accept of research project by signature

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Found external rectal fistula before ungoing transperineal ultrasonography 2.Lost or medical record in studied parts 3.No data on neonatal period diagnosis of ARM

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Performance of Transperineal ultrasonography versus prone lateral cross-table and urinalysis within 24 hr. diagnosis of performance	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis within 24 hr. comparison of method and time to diag.	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactAssist. Prof. Pornsri Thanachatchairattana

Department of surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol University

jiabsi@yahoo.com+66-917746422

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026