Skip to content

Phenotypic characterization in long-term follow-up of patients with severe ocular surface diseases after autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation

Phenotypic characterization in long-term follow-up of patients with severe ocular surface diseases after autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20180830003
Enrollment
13
Registered
2018-08-30
Start date
2018-03-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Limbal stem cell deficiency after COMET Limbal stem cell deficiency LSCD cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation COMET Limbal stem cells Stem cells Cornea

Interventions

Impression cytology and confocal microscopy were done in each patient who underwent COMET for at least 3 years to characterize the corneal surface after COMET whether it consists of corneal&#44
conjunctival or oral mucosal epithelial cells&#44
and corneal buttons from some patient who underwent penetrating keratoplasty after COMET were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and compared to impression cytology&#44
vivo confocal microscopy and clinical outcome.
Experimental Procedure/Surgery

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Lead Sponsor
Department of Ophthalmology&#44
Collaborator
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital&#44
Collaborator
Mahidol University
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 0 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient who diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency from several causes eg. Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Toxic epidermal necrolysis, Chemical burn, chronic inflammation, multiple surgery, Long term topical drugs usage or idiopathic. 2. Patient who underwent cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET) at least for 3 years, including patient who underwent Penetrating keratoplasty after COMET 3. Patients with total or partial limbal stem cell deficiency in the eye that underwent COMET 4. Preoperative impression cytology results showed that the patient had limbal stem cell deficiency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient age under 18 years old 2. Patient who had HIV infection 3. Patient who was diagnosed with active ocular infection 4. Patient with uncontrolled glaucoma 5. Pregnant patient 6. Patient who not willing to follow up 7. Patient who are not cooperate in treatment, either from psychological or physical problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Phenotypic characteristics of impression cytology of cornea after COMET On the latest follow up visit Impression cytology and immunofluorescence for specific markers

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation of impression cytology with in vivo confocal microscopy and clinical outcome On the latest follow up visit Impression cytology, slit-lamp examination and in vivo confocal microscopy,Correlation of impression cytology with immunohistochemistry study from corneal button On the latest follow up visit Corneal buttons from patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty were analyzed by pathologist

Contacts

Public ContactPinnita Prabhasawat

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

pinnita.t@gmail.com+6624198037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026