Skip to content

Factors affecting success rate of SMART restorations in mandibular primary molar teeth in preschoolers participating in the Dental Proactive Project of the public health region 12

Factors affecting success rate of SMART restorations in mandibular primary molar teeth in preschoolers participating in the Dental Proactive Project of the public health region 12

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20180809003
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2016-08-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy child&#44

Interventions

There was 162 teeth for class I restorations Clinical information regarding caries lesion and related factors were collected. Dental models were prepared from additional silicone impressions. For all
soft caries was removed by spoon excavator and then were restored with GIC (Fuji IX GP capsule&#44
GC Corp.&#44
Japan) by dental therapists as part of the ongoing regular project. Caries lesions dimensions were measured. Clinical examination for ART scores was conducted at 6&#45
month follow&#45
up. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were modeled for class I and class II restorations.,There was 141 teeth for class II restorations. Clinical information regarding caries lesion and relat
up. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were modeled for class I and class II restorations.
Treatment,Treatment
class I restorations,class II restorations

Sponsors

FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY
Lead Sponsor
GRADUATE SCHOOL&#44
Collaborator
PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
3 Years to 5 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy child aged 3-5 years-old co-operative behavior participants in the progect present dental caries for SMART class I and II restorations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: participants don't cooperative during treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
good/acceptable restoration 6, 12 months criteria by Phantumvanit et al

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
cavity characteristics 6, 12 months criteria by Phantumvanit et al

Countries

HADYAI

Contacts

Public ContactOitip Chankanka

FACULTY OF DENTISTRY,PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY

oitip_c@hotmail.com66-80-4512420

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026