Skip to content

Comparison between rifaximin vs lactulose for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Comparison between rifaximin vs lactulose for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20180509001
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-05-09
Start date
2016-12-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

treatment of hepatic encephalopathy hepatic encephalopathy rifaximin lactulose

Interventions

randomized double blind&#44
Comparison between rifaximin vs lactulose for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy,randomized double blind&#44
Comparison between rifaximin vs lactulose for treatment of hepatic encephalopathy
Experimental Drug,Active Comparator Drug
rifaximin,lactulose

Sponsors

Bio-innova and Synchron Co., Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged over 18 years. 2. Patients with diagnosis as Cirrhosis that its associated to the Hepatic encephalopathy and the severity of conn score ≥ 1. 3. Patients are in condition of Hepatic encephalopathy but have any supportive factors as follows; 3.1 Patients are in causing of the Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage which should have stopped bleeding before recruitment. 3.2 Patients are in causing of the spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or septicemia which should have taken antibiotics for infectious treatment before recruitment. 3.3 Patients have been received a lactulose but less than 1 day prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients have planned to perform the liver transplantation within 1 month prior to enrollment. 2. Patient who in recurrent of Hepatic encephalopathy within 3 months prior to enrollment. 3. Patients have received treatment with Portosystemic shunting i.e. Trans jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) within 3 months 4. Patients are in a chronic renal insufficiency which the serum Cr’s result is upper than 2.5 mg/dl or Patients are in acute kidney injury that requiring the dialysis treatment. 5. Patients have a history within 1 year of Central nervous injury or as Cerebrovascular disease. 6. Patients have been a non&#45;epileptic seizure. 7. Patients have diagnosed as Hepatocellular carcinoma. 8. Patients have diagnosed any Cancers&#44; except the Skin cancer is resolved by the surgery method within 1 year. 9. Patients have been a Major psychiatric illness. 10. Patients have been any severe comorbidity i.e. Hemodynamic compromise&#44; Respiratory insufficiency&#44; Severe anemia with the hemoglobin 10 gm/dl)&#44; Hypokalemia (< 2.5 mmol/L). 11. Patients are in temporality not feasible to get an oral administration. 12. Patients have a history of the severe adverse drug reaction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
improvement of clinical syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy 0&#44;3&#44;5&#44;10 days after drug administration improvement of clinical syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy,improvement of clinical syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy 0&#44;3&#44;5&#44;10 days after drug administration conn score&#44; asterixis grading

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
adverse drug event 0&#44;3&#44;5&#44;10 days after drug administration mortality rate&#44; length of hospital stay

Countries

thailand

Contacts

Public ContactWatcharasak Chotiyaputta

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital&#44; Mahidol University

watcharasak.cho@mahidol.ac.th022549008

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026