FindTrial
Sign In

Efficacy of Silk Suture Compared with Non-absorbable Polymer Clips for Cystic Duct Ligation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Efficacy of Silk Suture Compared with Non-absorbable Polymer Clips for Cystic Duct Ligation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20180503001
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-03
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Non&#45

Interventions

Apply non&#45
absorbable polymer clips for control cystic duct and cystic artery,Apply silk suture for control cystic duct and cystic artery
Active Comparator Device,Experimental Device
Non&#45
absorbable Polymer Clips,Silk suture

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A patient who going for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age more than 80 years old - Previous upper abdominal surgery - Concomittent CBD stone - Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bile leakage Postoperative 3 months Number of patient with bile leakage after surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operative time Finish operation Minute,Cost of operation Finish operation US dollar,Postoperative complication Postoperative 3 months Number of event—

Contacts

Public ContactAkkaraphorn Deeprasertvit

Unaffiliated

deeprasertvit@hotmail.com093-5326669

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026