Obesity Obesity Spinal orthosis thoracolumbar spine range of motion lateral Cobb angle
Conditions
Interventions
10 Participants who BMI ≤ 18.5 kg/m2 wear Jewett brace then x-
ray in upright and flexion position
,10 Participants who BMI 18.5-
24.9 kg/m2 wear Jewett brace then x-
ray in upright and flexion position,10 Participants who BMI 25-
29.9 kg/m2 wear Jewett brace then x-
ray in upright and flexion position,10 Participants who BMI 30-
34.9 kg/m2 wear Jewett brace then x-
ray in upright and flexion position,10 Participants who BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 wear Jewett brace then x-
ray in upright and flexion position
Active Comparator Device,Placebo Comparator Device,Active Comparator Device,Active Comparator Device,Active Comparator Device
Jewett in underweight group,Jewett in normal weight group,Jewett in overweight group,Jewett in obese class I group,Jewett in obese class II and III group
Sponsors
Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 18-40 years old Volunteer to participate in this study
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Conditions or diseases of spine Back pain Balance instability Cannot wear available sizes of Jewett brace Contraindication for radiography
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To study the effect of obesity on thoracolumbar flexion control of Jewett brace measure outcome immediate after wear device Change in lateral Cobb's angle in plain films | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| NA NA NA | — |
Countries
Thailand
Contacts
Public ContactNantawan Koonalinthip
Chulalongkorn University
Outcome results
None listed