Skip to content

Antiseptic dressing versus Negative pressure dressing techniques for uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Antiseptic dressing versus Negative pressure dressing techniques for uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20170331001
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-03-31
Start date
2017-03-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

wound condition appendicitis dressing antiseptic iodine vacuum wound infection

Interventions

suture with Nylon with conventional daily dry dressing (control),suture with Nylon with intraop 10% Povidone&#45
iodine top dressing (daily),suture with Vicryl with intraop simple vacuum wound dressing (once)
Conventional dressing,Antiseptic dressing ,Negative pressure dressing

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 15 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: uncomplicated pedatric appendicitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: complicated pedatric appendicitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to heal 7-14 days Date at follow-up,Wound infection 7-14 days Bacterial culture

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wound seroma 7-14 days Date at follow-up,Wound dehiscence 7-14 days Date at follow-up

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactWASUN NUNTASUNTI

Sisaket hospital

goofywasun@gmail.com660814432570

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026