High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children with respiratory distress

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

TCTR

Registry ID

TCTR20170222007

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2017-02-22

Start date

2014-06-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infants and children with respiratory distress HFNC&#44

Interventions

Use of high flow nasal cannula protocol,Control arm use of usual oxygen therapy

Experimental Device,Active Comparator Other

Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula protocol,Usual oxygen therapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

1 Months to 15 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Infants & children who were admitted to our hospital due to respiratory distress (respiratory rate greater than normal, signs of increased work of breathing or oxygen saturation in room air below than 95 %) were enrolled into the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteriaâ€™s were clinical respiratory failure that required immediate invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability, congenital cyanotic heart diseases, presence of air leak syndrome, nasal mucosa injury or refused to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
clinical improvement discharged from hospital clinical severity score	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Require mechanical ventilation PICU admission Rate of intubation	—

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactRujipat Samransamruajkit

Chulalongkorn University

rujipatrs@gmail.com+66818633296

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026