The inclusion criteria for participation in this study were: 1) having the respective age between 18 and 31,
Conditions
Interventions
The values of boosters in this study were three thousands,
fifteen thousands and thirty thousands (about 1,
5 and 10 dollar respectively). Payments in this program were at most 550 dollars (to each group) and were similar to other remedial programs (51,
52). The whole cost of boosters during the period of three month was 1200 dollars. The urine test band was used to investigate cocaine metabolite in four weeks in form of two weekly evaluations and th
Creatinine and PH and the threshold of 300 Nano grams in milliliter was considered for urine analysis. For negative urine samples (urine shortage of cocaine) coupon was specified. rewards for negative
for second sample was 3 dollar,
and for third negative test was considered 5 dollars and in the next stages 1.25 dollar was added to the reward value which after the urine negative test report was given to the participants. Coupons
participants were motivated to continue to take part in the study by email. All of the participants signed a contract in terms of expectations of remedial program (27). Also urine samples were taken f
all the participants of the study for the second time but this time in form of a posttest were evaluated through
Experimental Behavioral
Sponsors
non
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 31 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria for participation in this study were: 1) having the respective age between 18 and 31, 2) History of one months of cocaine avoidance, and 3) having at least the educational level of Diploma.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Also the exclusion criteria were: 1) Report of positive urine test during remedial period, 2) Taking supplementary drug and psychological remedies, and 3) three continuous weeks of absence from participation in remedial meetings.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The results showed that all three types of treatment played a efficacy in reducing the craving 12-week ANCOVA Univariate Model ,scores of craving was 12.04 with TPM, 13.89 with CM, 10.92 with Mix (p = 0.01) and 16.89 in control 12-week ANCOVA Univariate Model | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The highest variance explaining the changes in craving was assigned to the combined mix treatment. 12-week Scheffe’s post hoc | — |
Contacts
Public Contactbijan pirnia
phD student
Outcome results
None listed