Skip to content

The comparative effect between two different points of electrode stimulated of low TENS instrument in reducing neck pain

The comparative effect between two different points of electrode stimulated of low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) instrument in reducing neck pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20161230001
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-12-30
Start date
2017-01-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic neck pain Acupuncture&#45

Interventions

P,Placebo
Acupuncture&#45
like TENS: frequency 2 Hz&#44
pulse width 200 microseconds&#44
30 min/session&#44
7 sessions The electrodes will be placed at 4 acupuncture points as follows
GB20&#44
GB21&#44
SI14 and SI15 ,Acupuncture&#45
7 sessions The electrodes will be placed at the area of participant&#39
s pain.,The procedure is same as Arm 1&#44
but the tool is not opened.
Experimental Other,Active Comparator Other,Placebo Comparator No treatment
like TENS&#45
A,Acupuncture&#45

Sponsors

Faculty of Allied Health Sciences
Lead Sponsor
Department of Physical Therapy
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Aged 20&#45;35 years 2.Neck pain at least three months 3.VAS more than or equal 4 from 10 4.No treated with acupuncture or physiotherapy treatment at least two weeks 5.willingness to participate in research and the ability to participate complete study 6.Normal sensation 7.No herniate disc or fracture at the cervical and thoracic spine 8.Normal blood pressure 9.No history of tumor or cancer 10.No open wound or infection at electrode placed 11.No congenital abnormality of spine 12.No use heart pacemaker 14.No surgery of cervical spine at least 3 months 15.No allergic history of gel&#44; alcohol or adhesive tape 16.No pregnancy 17.No use analgesic or anti&#45;inflammation drug at least 2 week 18.Neck disability index score < 35

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.The participant would like to withdraw from the study 2.The participant who uses analgesic and anti&#45;inflammation drugs during the study 3.Receiving other treatment such as massage&#44; acupuncture

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain Before&#44; after 7th visit and followed up 2 week Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disability Before&#44; after 7th visit and followed up 2 week Neck Disability Index (NDI),Range of motion of neck Before&#44; after 7th visit and followed up 2 week Goniometer,Pain pattern Before&#44; after 7th visit and followed up 2 week Short&#45;form Mc&#45;Gill Questionaire Thai version

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Public ContactSukanya Eksakulkla

Faculty of Allied Health Sciences&#44; Chulalongkorn University

sukanyaj21@gmail.com+6622183768

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026