Skip to content

effects of mental imagery training combined electromyography-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Does mental imagery training combined electromyography-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (EMG-NMES) have better clinical outcomes for stroke survivors than EMG-NMES? Focus on the upper limb function and activities of daily living: A sin

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20161215002
Enrollment
68
Registered
2016-12-15
Start date
2016-12-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stokre with upper limb motor dysfunction EMG&#45

Interventions

The participants in MIT EMG&#45
NMES will be comfortably seated on the chair&#44
placed their upper limb on the desk&#44
and the elbow was flexed and rotated about 90 degrees. According to the study of Park et al (2004)&#44
the attachment sites of electrical stimuli were selected. An active electrode and a reference electrode will be attached to the origin and insertion of the extensor pollicis brevis and the extensor po
and the pad attachment sites were marked using a pen before application. When the electric potential generated through motion imagination reach the set EMG threshold easily during the intervention&#44
the EMG threshold would be reset to maximize the motion imagination of the affected upper limb. The intensity of the electrical stimulation is determined between 15 and 30 mA to allow sufficient exten
NMES will be applied to the wrist extensor muscle using 3 surface electrodes in the same way as the participants in MIT EMG&#45
NMES. First&#44
the voluntary wrist extension of the participant will be induced and the threshold be set based on the level of active potential according to muscle contraction. When the electric potential reache the
biphasic pulses with a frequency of 35 Hz and a pulse width of 200㎲ will be applied for 12 seconds. Then intensity of stimulation is set to be between 15 and 30 mA as in the MIT EMG&#45
NMES.
Experimental Device,Active Comparator Device
MIT EMG&#45
NMES,EMG&#45
NMES

Sponsors

There is no sponsor
Lead Sponsor
There is no sponsor
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (a) the participants with a first-time cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage which had been ascertained by computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for at least 6 months, (b) the participant who be able to have an active wrist extension at least 10 degrees, (c) Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) grade on the affected upper limb ≤ 2, (d) intact general cognitive function as determined by the Korean version of Mini-Mental Examination score ≥ 24 (Kang, Ku, Kim, & Park, 2011), and (e) Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire score ≤ 2.26 (Isaac & Marks, 1994).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (a) The participant with artificial cardiac pacemaker, (b) Medical Research Council (MRC) grade on the affected upper limb is 0, (c) The affected upper limb pain determined Visual Analogue Scale ≥ 5, and (d) The participant with skin lesions on the electrodes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Action Research Arm Test after 6 weeks intervention administrated by a assessor

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The Korean version of Modified Barthel Index after 6 weeks intervention administrated by a assessor

Countries

Republic of Korea

Contacts

Public ContactJin-Hyuck Park

Medis

roophy@naver.com82-10-6436-2419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026