Skip to content

Combined effects of action observation execution and ASAP based motor training in stroke

Effectiveness of action observation execution and motor training based on concepts of mirror neuron system of rehabilitation and accelerated skill acquisition program in subacute stroke

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
TCTR
Registry ID
TCTR20161007001
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-10-07
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke accelerated skill acquisition program task oriented training action observation execution stroke

Interventions

Motor training program based on accelerated skill acquisition program in which task oriented training (skills)&#44
impairment mitigation (capacity) and motivation are integrated. The patient selected task is the driver to gain skills. Action observation execution was administered to prime the motor training,After
the participants were given dose equivalent usual care (routine physical therapy treatment). Note: We had randomly allocated each participant of the matched pair into either experimental or control
each pair represented a unit) and the other pair automatically assigned to the next group. So we called matched pair randomized allocation. Since&#44
there was no option to select this type of allocation&#44
we described it here in this section.
Experimental Behavioral,Experimental Behavioral
Accelerated skill acquisition program ,Dose equivalent usual care

Sponsors

Mahidol University, Thailand
Lead Sponsor
Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences&#44
Collaborator
Nepal
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Unilateral MCA stroke- both ischemic and hemorrhagic. 2) Stroke at sub-acute stage (1 to 6 months) (51) 3) Impaired UE motor function indicating ‘mild to moderate’ level 4) At least a score of ‘1’ on the hand items of FMA-UE for finger mass extension/grasp release 5) Right handed prior to stroke (Edinburgh handedness inventory: score ≥ 8/10) 6) No cognitive impairments (mini-mental state examination ≥ 24) 7) Normal or corrected vision (NIHSS-visual field = 0)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe pain on upper extremity that interferes activities of daily life as indicated by FMA-UE pain = 0 on ≥ 3/5 joints. 2. Evidence of visual neglect (NIHSS neglect item ≥ 1) 3. Severely restricted passive range of motion at shoulder and elbow (Fugl Meyer, PROM = 0) 4. Severe to total sensory loss in UE indicated by NIHSS-sensory = 2 5. Medically or surgically unstable participants 6. Participants who are unable to sit independently for at least one hour.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wolf Motor Function Test Immediately after intervention and 1 week after movement time in seconds and functional ability score

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Stroke Impact Scale Immediately after intervention and 1 week after change in score,Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation scale, Brief Self efficacy scale Immediately after intervention and 1 week after change in score (visual analog score)

Countries

Nepal

Contacts

Public ContactJarugool Tretriluxana

Mahidol University

jarugool.tre@mahidol.ac.th.0846686831

Outcome results

None listed

Source: TCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026